Urinary EtG over time
① The curve is a model — pharmacokinetics are a probability cloud, not a promise. BAC is overlaid with a fixed visual scale so its shape stays comparable as inputs change.
① The curve is a model — pharmacokinetics are a probability cloud, not a promise. BAC is overlaid with a fixed visual scale so its shape stays comparable as inputs change.
A "positive" EtG depends on where somebody drew the line. Different programs draw it in different places.
Your liver conjugates a small fraction of ethanol with glucuronic acid. The result — ethyl glucuronide — is chemically stable, water-soluble, and excreted by the kidneys. It lingers well after the alcohol itself is gone4, which is the whole point of the test.
You will see "up to 80 hours" quoted confidently online. That tail comes from heavy, sustained consumption; in detoxification patients, urinary EtG took about 40–130 h to fall below 0.5 mg/L (500 ng/mL)11. One or two drinks typically clear the common 500 ng/mL cutoff in the 24–30 h neighborhood6. The curve above shows both.
Mouthwash, hand sanitizer, kombucha, ripe fruit, and certain communion wines can produce low-positive results at the 100 ng/mL cutoff8. This is why court-adjacent programs often pair EtG with EtS or raise their cutoff.
Real labs integrate over variable urine volumes, normalize by creatinine, and run two-tier confirmations. The graph above is the shape of what's happening in you, not the number a cup in a bathroom will produce on a Tuesday morning. Treat it as a teacher, not a witness.
The test measures concentration (ng/mL) of EtG, not the total amount of EtG your body has produced. Urine volume and timing can therefore move the measured number around even when the underlying metabolism is unchanged7.
Labs know this. Many programs check creatinine, specific gravity, and other validity markers so a diluted specimen can be reported as dilute or invalid rather than simply negative.
That is why the graph is best read as a concentration model with uncertainty around any real sample, not a guarantee about how a lab will classify one cup of urine.
The calculator is intentionally small: a cited set of assumptions feeds one pharmacokinetic model, and the chart renders that result. These are the assumptions currently active in the curve above.